Sequence of Returns Risk
The risk that poor returns arrive early in retirement, when withdrawals compound the damage.
During accumulation, the order of returns is irrelevant: the same set of annual returns produces the same ending balance in any sequence. Once withdrawals begin, that stops being true, and order becomes one of the largest determinants of whether a portfolio lasts.
The mechanism is that a withdrawal during a decline sells more shares to raise the same amount, permanently removing units that would otherwise have participated in the recovery. Two retirees with identical average returns over thirty years can end with very different balances, decided by which decade the bad years landed in.
This is why the first decade of retirement carries disproportionate weight, and why plans are stress-tested against sequences rather than averages. Commonly discussed responses include holding several years of expenses outside equities, and withdrawal rules that flex with portfolio performance rather than rising with inflation regardless.
Worked through
Gains arrive first
- +20%, +15%, +10%, -5%, -10%
- Early growth builds a cushion
- Later withdrawals draw on a larger base
The same five returns
Losses arrive first
- -10%, -5%, +10%, +15%, +20%
- Early withdrawals sell into declines
- Fewer units remain for the recovery
The same five returns, reordered
Where this lives in Promi
Investing page. Monte Carlo runs thousands of orderings rather than one average.
Related in FIRE & Financial Independence
See your own sequence of returns risk
Promi computes this from your linked accounts, with the definition one click from the number.
Try the demo